Charles Leeds wrote:

It seems like doing a parsing of two letter tokens for probability in a From: address would be very effective.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

yf
fq
qs
sm
mt
tf
fx
xx

That right there should identify the message as spam without ever looking at the message.

As I understand dspam, a letter combination doesn't constitute a token (apart from any number of letters being part of any single such).

As we have dspam running, its accuracy "as is" is 99+% over around 90,000 inbound messages (dspam_stats -H).

What's your point? Isn't dspam as is accurate enough for you?

--Tonni

--
Tony Earnshaw
Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl

Reply via email to