Marcin Krol wrote:
1. Try looking up the DSPAM factors in the message headers,
(you can view full message by pressing Ctrl-U in Thunderbird
or F9 in The Bat), the headers may give you some clue?

I just found out even for a spam correctly identified as spam, if
I classify it again, it will say it's innocent. If I delete the
headers generated by dspam (including the "Received by:" headers
it and Cyrus generated), then it will classify it as spam.

However, for a spam that wasn't identified, even after training it,
dspam is still classifying its header-removed version as innocent.

2. Have you changed the default spam-probability algorithms
in dspam.conf? You could tweak those and see what changes.

No.

--
Kent Tong
Useful news for CIO's at http://www2.cpttm.org.mo/cyberlab/cio-news

Reply via email to