Thanks John.
I think the major problem I might have is the UID. All my users share the
same UID and are authenticated via courier's mysql authentication. The UID
itself is not used to distinguish users, all users are distinguished by
their email address and have separate Maildir folders.
Because of that, I assumed that dspam's virtual_uids table would then also
have the same UID for all users, and just a different username field.
So will my setup work with dspam as is, considering that the virtual_uids
table has the same uid for all users?
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Peacock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ricardo Kleemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: [dspam-users] Fw: [dspam-dev] how does history work with
virtual users?
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
I have virtual users sharing the same uid, so basically they have a
common corpus base, but different settings due to virtual user setup.
If all users have the same UID then that is the only UID which will
accumulate history. The system is working corrrectly as you configured
it. Why did you set it up this way if you wanted each user to have their
own history/training? Perhaps you want to read the documentation on
shared groups (which means that you can have training that is shared, but
their own quarantine folder)? Or possibly you want to investigate global
groups (where shared classification is used until individual training
takes over)?
FWIW, in recent testing with 3.6.8, dspam started capturing spam messages
with less than 2 days training, so you may be overthinking this issue...
John
--
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
!DSPAM:65534,45e8599c84572691212089!
