Peter Cheng wrote:
Hi All,
Oi!

I really run out of idea how to configure DSPAM works this way. Would be appreciate if anyone advised me how to configure my dspam to works as following scenarios.
No problem!

I have configure the system to do the corpus database and it is quite ok at the beginning.. but after a weeks it seem to be miss out few spam.. those are using globaluser configuration.
Are you using already any type of group (classification, merged, etc)?
Because of that, i have done feed & train dspam on one email account assume is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". & now it is quite accurate.
Explain. When dspam makes an error, you shouldn't have to feed *or* train dspam - you should need only to *re*train (dspam --source=error --class=spam --user username --signature=signature).
Question:-
How do i configure everyone to refer to this database "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" instate of their own database ?
For this, if you are not already, you will need to use a group. There are quite a few types of groups (inoculation, merged, shared, classification, etc), as laid out in the README, but you will most likely want to use a merged group; to do so:

  1. Create a file named group in dspam's home directory, which is most
     likely /usr/local/var/dspam/.
  2. Inside this file, one line:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:merged:*

This will tell dspam to, at run time, merge [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s data with *.

Basically, I want to train one user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and other users just to use that user's database.
See above. While this will provide out-of-the-box accuracy, users will need to still retrain the errors that dspam makes for their mail, or else their accuracy will fall. To train, you should use dspam_train, with a corpus of spam AND ham, in maildir format, such as dspam_train [EMAIL PROTECTED] /path/to/spam/ /path/to/ham/

Thank you for the answer in advance..

Best Regards,
Peter Cheng
You are welcome, and I hope that this helps.
I am very inconsistent with these mailing lists, so if I do not respond to a later question, do forgive me.
--Kyle

Reply via email to