katsumi liquer wrote, on 18-04-2007 17:31: [...]
I apologize for the off-topic post,
No no! > I was hoping someone might have a
similar configuration idea they would be willing to share -- after all, even though it is postfix specific, it is definitely handy as a reference for complex DSPAM installations, right? Can only add value to the documentation? :) I would not have asked if I hadn't already read through the postfix documentation you mention, but I am in a jam.
I and thousands of others have a - not similar - configuration (I use it in practice) to share, but not on this list, since it has *nothing* to do with dspam, *everything* to do with Postfix. It's how I use Postfix to do anti virus with 3 different AV progs and dspam.
I will figure it out, I was just hoping someone might offer a nugget of experience ;) Last but not least, the 'HOWTO' you yuk about is the official dspam docs which come with the code -- is it that embarrassing?
Not to me, I don't use it - would never, try to avoid everything labelling itself as a "HOWTO", mostly written by people with patent ideas on how to save the world, given that ... I have nothing against people who write pointers (I've done so myself in the past), but those who aspire to "HOWTO"s need their minds examining. There are often a million ways of accomplishing any aim, as in this case, and those who thing they've reinvented the wheel, well ...
If you help, I am willing to share any other worldly knowledge I posses in exchange for your time (can you resist?!)
I have no problem with that, but I'd most probably do it on the Postfix ML - apart from the fact that I don't read that any longer (bless you, Wietse, for software that you've documented so brilliantly and has been running itself - with the help of your documentation - on my rigs since 2.3).
Hmmm ... if you (and nobody else) wants to exchange off list, you're welcome - but I have limited time.
Best, --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl
