> Not this way, you can train a batch of both spam and non-spam with > dspam_train, but it wants both together. > >> If the signature is not present, the command above fails. > > That's what the signature's for ... you're teaching it to reverse the > tokens that the signature points to, and they don't exist.
Yes... my point is why having signatures at all? My signatures table is HUGE. If I'm feeding dspam with the message in pristine format (without dspam headers, and stuff), dspam could correct errors even if there is no signatures... Am I dreaming here? Thanks Tony!
