Le 13/11/2007 17:40, Peter Larkowski écrivait : > [...] > Any ideas? I don't want to put the less accurate dspam into > production (especially if I've found a bug). I can send the log > files if that would help, just let me know what other info is relevant.
My guess would be : the processor of course. If dspam and all the rest is in the same software version, the only possible explanation lies in hardware optimizations the compiler uses I think. Since dspam uses a lot of floats, some minor calculation bug could show up, and translate to the *small* gap your stats shows. My .2cents Nico -- Nicolas Bouthors -=- Tel : 06 20 71 62 34 -=- Fax : 01 46 87 21 99 NBi SARL -=- http://nbi.fr -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
