Yeah as gentoo user, I say gentoo is a great community for getting some user support for this project. Hell, I am running gentoo-sparc on a Sun e450 and dspam runs on that with postfix =)

~D

Paul Cockings wrote:
Thanks for all the great posts about the dspam fork. I'll stick my hand up and say that I'm ready to setup sf.net and fork this project right away. I'm going to do this for the reasons: we can't commit back, track changes or get a response from Sensory networks.

If I'm offending anyone please say now, I'm not here to offend I just want to help.

The short term goals will be based around a place to track and fix bugs, improve existing docs and generally reawaken the dspam project. features etc can come later.

The most important bit to start is the new project name. Any suggestions welcome (Mine aren't very creative)
dspam-new?
open-dspam?
de-spam?
death-droid?





Mark Rogers wrote:
Steve wrote:
Be sure that everyone using DSPAM and capable of coding or doing other thins for DSPAM and some spare time will work on and for a forked DSPAM. Gentoo as community based Linux distro will sure be on board. I don't mean just me. All of the Gentoo users and maintainers.

I'd say this swings it if similar responses are found from other communities (or if other communities aren't sufficiently active with dspam to voice an opinion, as I suspect is the case with Debian at present). If the active developers and the distros follow the fork, it'll work. If not, it won't.

The first step has to be to incorporate patches and get into a "release often" position. Too many forks (imho) fail by starting out with grand ideas about the future direction of the project.

As far as I can tell (correct me if I'm wrong?) there is no way at present for the community to contribute to dspam releases, as the current owners are not doing anything with it so there's nowhere to send patches to that could be formally adopted? If so that's what forks are for. There's already enough for at least a new 3.8.x release, and it can't currently happen without a fork.



!DSPAM:474c5628244461804284693!


Reply via email to