* Brian Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I was wondering if anyone have any issues using the >> ParseToHeaders directives with the CVS version. > > Exactly which version is that? this could change by the second, > > Can't someone in command at the very least tag a the CVS tree > so that we have a reference point? Checkout a tarball, give it > a version number and call it a release? > > This kind of MO is simply not workable.
Does anyone have local access to the CVS tree? We could just convert it to a newer SCM system. Subversion is an easy transition, though its benefits over CVS are perhaps a bit limited. Given my choice, I'd stick it in bzr on Launchpad. That way, anyone could contribute on their own branch, then propose fixes/features for merging. It also helps a lot with bug tracking, support questions, feature tracking, and translations. -- Scott !DSPAM:1011,4848bdb9150922004892384!
