-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:38:54 +0200 > Von: 2beone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] DSPAM on FreeBSD 7-STABLE freezes after 1-2 days
> hi > > is there one place where all the known and maybe unknow ;) dspam > patches are being collected? > How about the DSPAM CVS repository? All the stuff should be there. > 2008/7/9 Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > >> Datum: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:50:01 -0500 > >> Von: Troy Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> An: dspam-users <[email protected]> > >> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] DSPAM on FreeBSD 7-STABLE freezes after 1-2 > days > > > >> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > >> > On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:03:47 -0500 > >> > Troy Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> >> Noor Dawod wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Hello folks, > >> >>> > >> >>> I have DSPAM run on FreeBSD 7-STABLE with latest Postfix, Postgrey, > >> >>> Dovecot and Amavisd. The DSPAM is running as a content filter > >> >>> defined in master.cf (--daemon option). > >> >>> Every one or two days, the DSPAM daemon stops listening to incoming > >> >>> connections and Postfix defers all deliverable messages because > >> >>> DSPAM doesn't accept connections. > >> >>> > >> >>> Anyone has an idea what to do in order to debug this problem? > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks, > >> >>> > >> >>> /Comrax > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> I don't have any ideas on debugging the problem. IIRC, some > previous > >> >> version of dspam would freeze unless logging was disabled. Try > >> >> disable logging? (I can't find any archived messages to backup my > >> >> assertion though) > >> >> > >> >> I'm curious. You running 64bit version of Freebsd? > >> >> > >> >> What version of DSPAM? > >> >> > >> >> At any rate I use dspam but not deamonized, because of stability > >> >> problems such as what you describe. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Can you elaborate? I'm not sure, but I don't remember a bug report > >> > about this. Did I miss you email or forgot about it? > >> > > >> > > >> There not much to tell really. In my case I was running dspam 3.6.4 > >> (later I tried 3.6.6 then 3.6.8), on RHEL4 on X86_64. > >> > >> http://mailing-list.nuclearelephant.com/2883.html > >> > >> At the time, I believe there was no facility to file a bug report. > >> > > I think this was due the bug in bnr debugging and was/is fixed with this > patch: > > --- src/libdspam.c 2006-07-17 02:14:02.000000000 +0200 > > +++ src/libdspam.fix_bnr_debug.c 2007-12-10 20:33:53.905085288 > +0100 > > @@ -986,8 +986,10 @@ > > if (CTX->flags & DSF_NOISE) { > > nobnr_result = _ds_calc_result(CTX, heap_nobnr, diction); > > > > - if (CTX->factors) > > + if (CTX->factors) { > > _ds_factor_destroy(CTX->factors); > > + CTX->factors = NULL; > > + } > > CTX->result = x; > > CTX->probability = DSP_UNCALCULATED; > > } > > > > > >> > >> -Troy > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? > > Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer !DSPAM:1011,48758e2c150921786510675!
