-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:30:10 -0500 > Von: Troy Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] How to force whitelisting ?
> Steve wrote: > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > > >> Datum: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:48:47 -0500 > >> Von: Troy Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> An: [email protected] > >> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] How to force whitelisting ? > >> > > > > > >> - Full email address matching ( IE "Joe Schmoe" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ) > >> > >> > > You really want RFC822 style address format syntax checks? Would RFC821 > style address format syntax not be enough (aka: [EMAIL PROTECTED])? I > ask because most users will probably know "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to be > the address to whitelist and not the full RFC822 address "Joe Schmoe" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. However.... the RFC821 style address format syntax would > match a full blown RFC822 address but not the other way around. > > > Yes, really. My thinking here is that it would be harder for someone to > hit the whitelist by accident, since they'll need to know more that just > the email address. > But this is basically what the current whitelisting does for you just it does it automatically and you have not a easy way to modify the entries. You can however add new entries. > >> - Option to match on from address and/or "Reply-to:" address. > >> > > Per entered whitelist address? > > > No. Globally would be fine. > Globally for every DSPAM user or per user? > >> - Administratively managed per user whitelist > >> > > So one admin is managing a users whitelist? This is different then the > other request from a ML member where each user is managing only his own > list. > > > Indeed. Not everyone can trust their users to put in valid data in the > whitelist. > Funny. If you are the admin, then I see a gazillion of other (easier) options to manage whitelists then "missusing" the content filter for doing that. > >> - No user managed whitelist. > >> > > See above. > > > >> - No global whitelist. > >> > > See above. > > > >> - dspam gui displays whitelisted emails. > >> > > In a different way then the automatic whitelisted addresses? Currently > whitelisted entries are shown in violet color in the DSPAM Web UI. Do you > want the mails matching the manual entered email whitelist addresses to be > colored/tagged differently in the Web UI? > > > Yes, a different way totally. I envision a new whitelist tab something > similar to the alert tab. In my case users would not be able to enter > their own email addresses to whitelist, but would just see a plaintext > list of manually whitelisted email address (again similar to the the way > alerts are listed). Or perhaps the list can be displayed in an existing > tab somewhere in the web UI. > More or less a read only display of the whitelist active for the user, with no possibility to modify any entry. > I should have said "dspam gui displays *manually* whitelisted emails." > I see no need to change the appearance of nether automatic nor manually > whitelisted emails displayed in the history tab of the dspam web UI. > I see. > > > > > >> -Troy > >> > >> // Steve -- Psssst! Schon das coole Video vom GMX MultiMessenger gesehen? Der Eine für Alle: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/messenger03 !DSPAM:1011,4876604a150929273014105!
