-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:23:30 +0200 > Von: Manuel Molina Cuberos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: [dspam-users] SBPH usage
> Hello all! > > We're using DSPAM version 3.6.8 with the following features: > > Feature noise > Feature chained > Feature whitelist > Feature tb=4 > > We're using MySQL as the data backend for DSPAM. We plan to host several > thousand domains, with a total of about 10000 accounts of our clients. > We're using now TUM in the incoming mail, but because we use a shared > group that only we administrate, we're thinking about moving to TOE or > not. > > Actually we're not using SBPH, and my question is: In our configuration, > can be profitable for us to add "Feature sbph" ? What's the difference > between using it or not ? > Using SPBH (Sparse BP Hashing) would require you to switch the storage away from MySQL since no other DSPAM storage beside CSS is able to handle SBPH. If you like something like SBPH and want to keep MySQL, then I would suggest you to look into OSB (Orthogonal Sparse biGram). > Regards, > Steve -- Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser !DSPAM:1011,488ef865150922106559862!
