On Jun 13, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Charles Scott wrote:

> Steve:
>
> Everything you say is correct, but you're not considering the poor HT
> user. If you assume 0db of gain for the receive antenna you're  
> probably
> anywhere from 6 to 20 dB above the signal actually received by an HT  
> on
> someone's belt. For them the additional TX power is critical,  
> especially
> for D-Star since with analog FM they might actually hear at least one
> squelch crash.
>
> Chuck - N8DNX
>


Don't forget that most reports are showing the HT's are quite a bit  
more sensitive (but not very selective) compared to the mobiles.  One  
report I read (I haven't done it myself) was that an IC-91AD's 12dB  
SINAD point on Analog is down around .15uV.  I'm having no problems at  
all hearing our repeater in buildings from more than 25 miles out... I  
haven't had a chance to try further, but it's full-scale at that  
distance.

Today I talked into the W0CDS UHF Port B repeater (which is at at  
roughly 9000' MSL) from a location just under 6000' MSL 90 miles out  
with the ID-800H on low power.  Diamond SG-7800 antenna (very good,  
granted) on this end.    I'm limited more by curvature of the Earth  
than path loss out here, but we're still talking a rather large loss  
at 441.9625 on the input frequency.

Additionally on our comm trailer at the same site, N0WBW's ID-800H is  
also accessing the repeater on a standard Larsen NMO mobile antenna on  
the roof.

The repeater has no pre-amp, no amplifier, and good quality pre- 
selector single can on the receive, in addition to the good quality DB  
4-can duplexer.  4-bay Sinclair 1/2 wave spaced folded dipole array,  
fed with 7/8" hardline.

I agree with Steve.  Start without the pre-amps and amps and build  
right, and then see if you need to add anything... these things work  
great.  For 15 miles of my travels coming out of Denver to our  
contesting site near Limon, CO -- I held a QSO with someone while the  
signal strength indication on the mobile rig was nothing... zilch...  
no bars at all.  Impressive.

Who needs more than that?  Who cares what the signal strength says,  
I'm 90 miles out and using the machine.  At least in our territory  
where the machines can go on mountains (or mole-hills, in the case of  
our test site, can't wait to see what it'll do at 11,000 MSL or so) --  
there's just no need for the PA's or the pre-amps.  It's well-balanced  
as-is.

My $0.02 and another $7 will get you some over-burnt Starbucks  
coffee.  :-) :-) :-)

--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to