dulwich-users  

Messages by Thread

• [Dulwich-users] Jeff Watton : Stop Yandy From Using Our Culture As A Costume joshua . m . grant
• [Dulwich-users] Moving the mailing list to Google groups Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Is dulwich 0.15.1 coming to PyPi soon? Erik Swanson
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Is dulwich 0.15.1 coming to PyPi soon? Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Python 3 compatibility Lele Gaifax
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 compatibility Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 compatibility Lele Gaifax
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 compatibility Lele Gaifax
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 compatibility Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 compatibility Lele Gaifax
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 compatibility Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 compatibility Bruce Duncan
• [Dulwich-users] get_untracked_files function Radosław Warzocha
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] get_untracked_files function Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Re-licensing under dual GPLv2+/Apachev2+ Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Re-licensing Dulwich under dual GPLv2+/Apachev2+ Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] RFC: Closing resources and controlling cache life times Gary van der Merwe
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] RFC: Closing resources and controlling cache life times Gary van der Merwe
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] RFC: Closing resources and controlling cache life times Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] RFC: Closing resources and controlling cache life times Gary van der Merwe
• [Dulwich-users] Windows QA Gary van der Merwe
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Windows QA Gary van der Merwe
• [Dulwich-users] Dulwich security issue Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Git vulnerability CVE-2014-9390 Andi McClure
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Git vulnerability CVE-2014-9390 Gary van der Merwe
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Git vulnerability CVE-2014-9390 Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Fwd: Python 3 porting Nicklas Börjesson
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Fwd: Python 3 porting Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Running test suite on window 7 Gary van der Merwe
• [Dulwich-users] Python 3 porting Gary van der Merwe
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 porting Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 porting Gary van der Merwe
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 porting Jelmer Vernooij
  • [Dulwich-users] Fwd: Python 3 porting Gary van der Merwe
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 porting Gary van der Merwe
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Python 3 porting Gary van der Merwe
• [Dulwich-users] Getting Started Joshua Grant
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Getting Started [email protected]
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Getting Started Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' Andi McClure
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' Andi McClure
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' jelmer
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' jelmer
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' Andi McClure
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' Gary van der Merwe
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi' anatoly techtonik
• [Dulwich-users] Pushing to bitbucket via https generates SendPackError: unpack eof before pack header was fully read Crispin Wellington
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Pushing to bitbucket via https generates SendPackError: unpack eof before pack header was fully read Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Pushing to bitbucket via https generates SendPackError: unpack eof before pack header was fully read Crispin Wellington
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Pushing to bitbucket via https generates SendPackError: unpack eof before pack header was fully read Crispin Wellington
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Pushing to bitbucket via https generates SendPackError: unpack eof before pack header was fully read Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Pushing to bitbucket via https generates SendPackError: unpack eof before pack header was fully read Crispin Wellington
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Pushing to bitbucket via https generates SendPackError: unpack eof before pack header was fully read Crispin Wellington
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/6] Support for graftpoints milki
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 4/6] parse_graftpoints milki
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 6/6] Update NEWS milki
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/6] Add GraftedCommit object milki
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 5/6] serialize_graftpoints milki
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/6] Support for graftpoints milki
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/6] Support for graftpoints Tay Ray Chuan
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 1/6] Graft Tests milki
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 3/6] getitem returns GraftedCommit milki
• [Dulwich-users] Dulwich 0.9.1 Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Specifying a file's path? Adam Seering
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Specifying a file's path? milki
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Specifying a file's path? Adam Seering
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Specifying a file's path? Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] retrieve the last revision id of a file Adrien Saladin
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] retrieve the last revision id of a file Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] retrieve the last revision id of a file Adrien Saladin
• [Dulwich-users] Relicensing Dulwich under dual Apache2 and GPLv2. Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Relicensing Dulwich under dual Apache2 and GPLv2. Jeremy Whitlock
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Relicensing Dulwich under dual Apache2 and GPLv2. milki
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Relicensing Dulwich under dual Apache2 and GPLv2. anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Relicensing Dulwich under dual Apache2 and GPLv2. Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Relicensing Dulwich under dual Apache2 and GPLv2. Ronny Pfannschmidt
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Relicensing Dulwich under dual Apache2 and GPLv2. Michael Hudson-Doyle
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Relicensing Dulwich under dual Apache2 and GPLv2. Gary van der Merwe
• [Dulwich-users] Released 0.9.0 Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] client.clone, repo.checkout and config core.filemode false Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] client.clone, repo.checkout and config core.filemode false Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] [ANNOUNCE] dulwich 0.8.6 Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] changes_from_tree Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] changes_from_tree Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] changes_from_tree Mark Mikofski
• [Dulwich-users] Fetch branch Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Fetch branch Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Fetch branch Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Fetch branch Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Fetch branch Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] submodules support Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] submodules support Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Mark Mikofski
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich porcelain Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] how to create an object from a SHA1 value Wenhao Xu
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] how to create an object from a SHA1 value milki
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] how to create an object from a SHA1 value Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Having git invoke dul-receive-pack on push Jon Chu
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Having git invoke dul-receive-pack on push Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] "make install" fails Joe Hays
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] "make install" fails milki
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] "make install" fails Michael Gale
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] "make install" fails Joe Hays
• [Dulwich-users] fetching a remote branch?? Michael Gale
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] fetching a remote branch?? Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Deleting a remote branch via Dulwich? Andi McClure
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Deleting a remote branch via Dulwich? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Deleting a remote branch via Dulwich? Andi McClure
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Deleting a remote branch via Dulwich? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Deleting a remote branch via Dulwich? Andi McClure
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Deleting a remote branch via Dulwich? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Deleting a remote branch via Dulwich? Andi McClure
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Deleting a remote branch via Dulwich? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Deleting a remote branch via Dulwich? Andi McClure
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Deleting a remote branch via Dulwich? Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] how to add remote and compare to current master? Felix Schwarz
• [Dulwich-users] `Repo.clone` not adding remote Ram Rachum
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] `Repo.clone` not adding remote Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] rev-parse and merge-base Ram Rachum
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] rev-parse and merge-base Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] rev-parse and merge-base Ram Rachum
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] rev-parse and merge-base Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] rev-parse and merge-base Ram Rachum
• Re: [Dulwich-users] Notes on developing new Dulwich backend Dave Borowitz
• [Dulwich-users] 0.8.4 coming soon Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Dulwich on Python 2.4 Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich on Python 2.4 Dave Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich on Python 2.4 Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich on Python 2.4 Augie Fackler
• [Dulwich-users] upcoming 0.8.1 release Jelmer Vernooij
• Re: [Dulwich-users] [ANN] hg-git 0.3.0 - compatible with 1.9.x Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [ANN] hg-git 0.3.0 - compatible with 1.9.x Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [ANN] hg-git 0.3.0 - compatible with 1.9.x Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [ANN] hg-git 0.3.0 - compatible with 1.9.x Steve Borho
• [Dulwich-users] HTTP git protocol support Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] HTTP git protocol support Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] HTTP git protocol support Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] [MERGE] Deprecate ``Repo.revision_history`` in favour of ``Repo.get_walker``. Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH] diff_tree: Factor out a protected _add_change method. dborowitz
• Re: [Dulwich-users] dulwich 0.7.2: OS X Lion compilation Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCHv2 00/13] Miscellaneous cleanup and bugfixes. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 01/13] Pass an HTTP request object through to handlers. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 02/13] server: Allow cloning an empty repo. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 03/13] diff_tree: Do easy copy detection without find_copies_harder. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 04/13] pack: Allow reading of empty packs. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 05/13] object_store: Don't send a pack with duplicates of the same object. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 06/13] pack: Cache binary SHA of unpacked objects. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 07/13] server: Correctly advertise capabilities during receive-pack. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 08/13] server: Sort ref advertisements. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 09/13] diff_tree: Fix add/add and add/exact rename conflicts. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 10/13] diff_tree: Use built-in defaultdict module correctly. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 11/13] diff_tree: Factor out a few protected methods in RenameDetector. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 12/13] diff_tree: Remove unnecessarily complicated _matches_any_parent. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 13/13] web: Use correct result MIME types. dborowitz
• [Dulwich-users] Deprecate Repo.revision_history()? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Deprecate Repo.revision_history()? Dave Borowitz
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 00/13] Miscellaneous cleanup and bugfixes dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 01/13] Pass an HTTP request object through to handlers. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 02/13] server: Allow cloning an empty repo. dborowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 02/13] server: Allow cloning an empty repo. Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 02/13] server: Allow cloning an empty repo. Dave Borowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 03/13] diff_tree: Do easy copy detection without find_copies_harder. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 04/13] pack: Allow reading of empty packs. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 05/13] object_store: Don't send a pack with duplicates of the same object. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 06/13] pack: Cache binary SHA of unpacked objects. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 07/13] server: Correctly advertise capabilities during receive-pack. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 08/13] server: Sort ref advertisements. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 09/13] diff_tree: Fix add/add and add/exact rename conflicts. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 10/13] diff_tree: Use built-in defaultdict module correctly. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 11/13] diff_tree: Factor out a few protected methods in RenameDetector. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 12/13] diff_tree: Remove unnecessarily complicated _matches_any_parent. dborowitz

• Earlier messages