Hi Ranjeet,

I don't get the "issue" you mentioned. What exactly is the problem? To me your implementation seems fine.

If you refer to the porosity output you obtained in the el-problem, it just looks like this is because you are using vertex-wise output of an element-wise field.

Best wishes,
Dennis


On 13.02.19 05:00, Ranjeet kumar wrote:
Dear All,
I am trying to implement multidoamin/poromechanics/el2p for heterogeneous problem. Considering the value of porosity and permeability are stored in vector initPoro_ and initK_ respectively.  Porosity and permeability is returned using element Idx in their respective methods.

    //! Returns the porosity of the porous medium.
    template<class ElementSolution>
    Scalar porosity(const Element& element,
                    const SubControlVolume& scv,
                    const ElementSolution& elemSol) const
    {
        const auto eIdx = this->fvGridGeometry().elementMapper().index(element);         return PorosityDeformation<Scalar>::evaluatePorosity(this->fvGridGeometry(), element, scv, elemSol, initPoro_[eIdx]);
    }

The porosity output for 2p and poroelastic are different (can be viewed using below link):
https://home.iitb.ac.in/index.php/s/M7b0ZpTNFt5Wesr (2p)
https://home.iitb.ac.in/index.php/s/uJFpUoq6rtxQo25 (el)

Could you please give some idea the fix the above issue?

Thank You,

Regards,
Ranjeet










_______________________________________________
Dumux mailing list
Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de
https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
_______________________________________________
Dumux mailing list
Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de
https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux

Reply via email to