So I would think we need to get DUNDi distributed as a library so people
can include it in their resolvers. Is such an initiative underway
somewhere? I don't know if that means just pulling the code out of
Asterisk and making it a library or rebuilding it from scratch. Either
way, I would think a library is what we need to get more widespread
adoption, particularly amongst larger carriers not willing to use Asterisk.
-Anders Brownworth
R&D
Bandwidth.com
Mark Spencer wrote:
You've summed it up just right. The nice thing of DUNDi as the top
level is that you can have other technologies (e.g. 302 redirect) or
anything else underneath for storing overlapping directories.
Mark
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Anders Brownworth wrote:
I might be a little out of the loop on this but at one point Mark was
talking about layering DUNDi over the various ENUM solutions. Or I
guess I should say using DUNDi as the top-most resolver over
"anything else" because for example with ENUM which is based on DNS,
numbers don't divide up cleanly the way names do. DUNDi doesn't
enforce that walled garden on numbers, so IMHO it's better suited to
being a top level resolver.
Again, I may be in the dark on current activity, but I would think
there should be an initiative for a DUNDi sample library distributed
on it's own. (outside of the Asterisk codebase) IMHO, it should be.
-Anders Brownworth
R&D
Bandwidth.com
_______________________________________________
Dundi mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/dundi
_______________________________________________
Dundi mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/dundi
_______________________________________________
Dundi mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/dundi
