hi all!
I have the following situation:
1 -------- 2
¦ ¦
¦ ¦
3----------4
¦ ¦
¦ ¦
5----------6
where 1 ... 6 are nodes and every direct neighbor is specified as a dundi peer
(in *). When I start a dundi request, every queried node is mentioned in the
dpdiscover. For example 1 sends a discover to 2 and 3, so 2 sees in the EID or
EID_DIRECT field that a discover has also been sent to 3. So much for that. Is
this field also filled with the neighbour peers even if they are
unreachable/offline?
1 ---x---- 2
¦ ¦
¦ ¦
3----x-----4
¦ ¦
¦ ¦
5----------6
My problem: When links break (e.g. 1-2 and 3-4) I have the problem that 6
doesn't forward the query (received from 5) to 4, because 4 is mentioned in the
EID or EID_DIRECT field even though it is not possible that this peer could
have been reached.
Is this a problem of the protocol or can I fix this by setting a special
option? Thanks for helping.
Best regards
Andre
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
Dundi mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/dundi
