On 28.04.2014 14:55, Michael Terry wrote: >> this could raise a key not found error. can you really guaratee the key will >> be there? > > Yes, because now query_info calls the backend query function, then makes sure > that 'size' exists for each filename passed. This was part of the "allow > backends to be dumb" strategy -- if they skip a filename or don't provide > 'size', the rest of duplicity doesn't have to care. Guarantees come from the > wrapper class, not the backends. > >> any reason why you removed rsync here? > > Yeah, I changed the rsync backend to support relative/local urls. This was > so we could test it as part of our normal automated tests (without needing a > server). The list I removed 'rsync' from was a list of backends that require > a hostname. >
well done.. thx ede -- https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/duplicity/backend-unification/+merge/216764 Your team duplicity-team is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-unification into lp:duplicity. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
