Hi! Ralph Glasstetter wrote:
>>Before I continue, please note that I had to commit r120 today - some >>earlier release broke the Windows build. :-(... > > > Hmmm,... r116 seemed to be ok... Of course - that was before the changes that broke it. > But thanks for reminding me... I forgot to compile r119 when packing the > snapshot for my webspace! So the corrupt version probabely never has been > made published... ;-) It couldn't - you would not have been able to compile r119 on Windows. >>Maybe your Qt installation lacks a feature mine has. Can you send me a >>copy of your <qfeatures.h> file, please? > > > Here it is,... better... here they are, since on my system there are 3 of > them, whereof the first two are identical and slighly older: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11969 2007-04-03 18:56 /usr/include/Qt/qfeatures.h > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11969 2007-04-03 18:56 /usr/include/QtCore/qfeatures.h > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 27049 2007-09-19 15:49 /usr/lib/qt3/include/qfeatures.h What a mess... > Guess the last is the correct one, since it's in the same place than the > installed libraries. Yep, it's got to be the last one because we're using Qt 3. The others are from Qt 4. There doesn't seem to be anything wrong with it, though. Just the fact that the file dialog doesn't seem to remove the "file:" prefix as mine does. Could be a bug in Qt 3.3.5's implementation of class QUrlOperator (which has changed somewhere between 3.3.5 and 3.3.7). Can you upgrade Qt3 to the latest version? -- Michael "Tired" Riepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Tired: Each morning I get up I die a little ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ DVBCUT-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dvbcut-user
