Stephen Leake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So it would seem the current behavior is a mistake, and dvc-diff-ediff > should be changed to do: > > (dvc-file-ediff-revisions on-modified-file > dvc-diff-base > dvc-diff-modified) > > Any objections?
Seems OK, yes. We started without a convention (Xtla was inconsistant with itself at some point in time), and we (I, IIRC), made it consistant without realizing that the rest of the world was doing it the other way around. The only drawback of your proposal is that it will confuse old users, but ... -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
