Toby Allsopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Sat, Jan 26 2008, Stefan Reichör (SR) and Michael Olson (MO) wrote:
>
> SR> The first important point for contributions is, that you must sign
> SR> Emacs papers. I guess that you are willing to do that. Michael Olson
> SR> will provide the details for this process.
>
> MO> Another thing to keep in mind is that if your patches cumulatively
> MO> change more than 15 or so lines, we'll need you to fill out a copyright
> MO> assignment form for the FSF.  Email me off-list if you want to get that
> MO> out of the way.
>
> Okay, no problem.  I'll sort this out with Mr. Olson.

Great :-)

> SR> I prefer one branch for every active contributor. I have set up
> SR> bookmarks list. This setup makes merging very easy. So when you are
> SR> planning to help us improving DVC, it is best that you create your own
> SR> branch. I will merge your changes.
>
> MO> A public bzr branch would be much easier.  Just be sure to set up
> MO> `bzr-mail-notification-destination'.  Then when you make a change, bring
> MO> up the log buffer, and hit "M" on an entry to send us a notification
> MO> about it.
>
> Okay, I'll do that.  I'll probably use Launchpad to host it.
>
> MO> DVC's Gnus integration actually doesn't seem to support "bzr send" yet.
> MO> (A patch to implement support for it might be nice.)  We do support
> MO> patches sent via "M-x dvc-submit-patch RET", however.
>
> dvc-submit-patch requires that the changes be uncommitted, correct?

Exactly. It is meant for occasional patches. For more patches please
setup your own DVC branch.


Stefan.

_______________________________________________
Dvc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev

Reply via email to