On Tuesday, 19 April 2011 at 05:33, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > On 18 Apr 2011, at 23:42, Nico Sabbi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Reimar Döffinger ha scritto: > >> > >> Well, for git any config is still missing as well (including > >> commit hooks), and DNS still hasn't switched either. > >> With the backup files it should be faster to get it running > >> initially (without them it would of course the same effert > >> and might make more sense to go with git directly). > >> Also speaking from MPlayer side which currently uses svn externals > >> for dvdnav I would prefer it if we didn't do all in one step > >> but gave it some extra time. > >> But do what you feel is best. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> > > > > well yes, I gave for granted that we should take the decision > > without haste. > > From what you wrote I assume that the main repository of mplayer > > will stay in svn, right? > > No, I am not at all opposed to switching. Of course other developers > get a say, but dvdnav/dvdread (and that I have never tried git > submodules) are actually the main reason to stick with SVN now.
FWIW, I'm fine with either option, but I still slightly prefer SVN. OTOH, I could finally learn git properly. :) Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" _______________________________________________ DVDnav-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
