>> > > >>Ugh! That patch "worked" but was wrong. It was comparing an offset >> > > >>into >> > > >>the >> > > >>title to raw sector numbers. Here's a correction. >> > > >> >> > > >Just a follow up to let you know that this patch is in my tree >> > > >currently. If you make any modifications, please feel free to >> > > >update this thread w/ a new patch. >> > > > >> > > Thanks. I've done quite a bit of testing with this version and a "bad" >> > > disc I created with a dry-erase marker. It's performing solidly. Also >> > > got it into the hands of one of our users that had a few problem discs >> > > and it worked well for him. >> > >> > Ping Nico. Could you approve/reject this? >> >> Ping2. > > Ping3. Anyone?
It is still in my tree. If John could address Reimar's last qualms: | Is a whole lot simpler but still feels suboptimal. | I also don't know if handling the cell change is quite right here or | if it wouldn't belong into dvdnav_scan_admap... But I think that we could probably submit the patch w/out addressing these last issues. E -- Erik Hovland [email protected] http://hovland.org/ _______________________________________________ DVDnav-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
