On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:17:32AM -0700, Erik Hovland wrote : > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:11:58AM -0700, Erik Hovland wrote : > >> What I am especially uncomfortable w/ is that we do not have > > > > Erik, please, do not misunderstand me: I am just sending upstream, the > > patches I have, especially the ones I don't feel confident about, so > > upstream can be the best. I don't expect those to be merged. > > > > However, I doubt Original Coder did it just for fun... :) > > Sorry, I was just being blunt. I understand that you aren't trying to > get this patch accepted, just inspected. I get where you are coming > from.
No problem. To me, the conclusion of this is thread is that: - this patch is crap and should be dropped (I'll do that quite soon). Which is what I expected, to be honest. - a patch for a better handly of udf volume descriptor would be nice to have. Thanks a lot for the support :D Best Regards, -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734 Sent from my Electronic Device _______________________________________________ DVDnav-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
