On 2/5/13, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 05 February 2013 at 21:04, Reimar Döffinger wrote: >> On 5 Feb 2013, at 20:34, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Tuesday, 05 February 2013 at 17:48, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >> >> >> >> As I am a bit annoyed by the lack of response and maintenance on this >> >> project, and also because I am not happy when the programs are the >> >> ones >> >> pointed at when there is a crash inside this library, I am, for _now_, >> >> forking the project on the videolan infrastructure. >> > >> > You could've just asked Reimar for commit access. I don't think anybody >> > would have anything against it as you are one of the few active >> > developers here. >> >> He doesn't have access? I wasn't aware. >> If that is the problem just send me desired username and password and >> I'll >> set the account up. >> Because we are now up to two forks/separate repositories with lots of >> patches >> in them that nobody can find via the homepage, this certainly isn't >> progress! > > Jean, please follow up with Reimar and commit all bugfix patches. > New features are fine too, as long as they don't break ABI and API. > I don't think there were any ABI or API breaking patches floating > around, but if there were, let's wait until the next release with > applying them. I would take care of at least some of that, but I don't > have too much free time these days. > > That reminds me we should make a new release with all those bugfixes.
So are we ok with sticking with the one mainline repository, as long as j-b has commit rights and ability to cut new releases? Then there will be an active maintainer :) -roger- _______________________________________________ DVDnav-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
