On 10/31/13, Erik Hovland <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Roger Pack <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 10/29/13, Paul Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Dear Timothy, >>> >>> >>> Am Sonntag, den 27.10.2013, 18:06 -0700 schrieb Timothy Gu: >>> >>>> It's quite some time before the last release. There are some critical >>>> security fixes in SVN now. I guess it should be time for a new release. >>> >>> before sending a message next time, please take the time to at least >>> look through the list archives of the last two months. Then you would >>> have found the thread [1] >>> >>> [DVDnav-discuss] new release, call for patches >>> >>> and you would have known that a release is indeed. >>> >>>> Also, if possible, can someone back port changes in the VideoLAN's fork >>>> to >>>> the official one? >>> >>> Not until somebody sends the patches to the list for review. It would be >>> great if you could do it. `git format-patch` and `git send-email` should >>> help with this. >> >> The main repo is subversion, isn't it, though? > > It is. But our development trees will gladly accept patches from git > sent by email. Is anyone using straight subversion for their > day-to-day development? I have been using git-svn for some time now.
(of course, as previously stated, my personal preference would be to have the main repo in git/github as well, as stated before...) _______________________________________________ DVDnav-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
