On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Lije Carpenter <[email protected]>wrote:
> The solution that springs to my mind is to have a robust editor that > behaves like Deepest Sender (which is, sadly, Firefox-specific); that's what > I use now to make any picture-heavy posts where the photos need to be > interspersed with text. Even better, it gives the poster the ability to go > back and forth seamlessly between the RTF and plain HTML editors, so you can > use whichever you prefer for a given task within an entry. > > > principia_coh > Alexis Carpenter > > > ----- Wahiaronkwas David wrote: > > | Alrighty. I have no problem typing the html - I rarely use the rtf > > | editor on LJ, and only if I want to torture myself. I'm thinking of > > | people like my sister, who isn't so comfortable typing html, and > > | getting the URL correct. > > | > > | I just can't figure out the proper way of writing my wish. Ach. > > | > > | w > > _______________________________________________ > dw-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss > The biggest problem with that is not everyone is comfortable having to use RTF for their entry-writing. I for one hate it and would prefer using PhotoBucket over being lazy with hosting my images on the service. I know that not everyone likes having to rely on raw coding but in the longrun it'd be a lot easier to work on re-training yourself to using the old img src html function.
_______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
