Your assumption is not justified. Use of any proposed, or even "adopted", extension by an implementation is strictly *own risk*. There is a well-defined implementation defined extension mechanism that provides an alternative..
Note that the status of the DWARF issue you mention is "open" -- that is, it is not even adopted yet. The DWARF V5 revision effort is just getting underway. While a few minor changes have been discussed and approved *in principle*, none has yet to be codified into even a draft revised specification. Ron --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed GCC already outputs the proposed DW_LANG_Go from > http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=101014.1 > I assume there are other such smaller/constants changes that are just OK > without needing a major DWARF spec revision. Is there a list of such > preliminary accepted issues/updates/constants? > > Thanks, > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > Dwarf-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
