Hi, On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:46:55AM -0400, Eric Christopher via Dwarf-Discuss wrote: > "This margin is too narrow to contain..." ;) > > I'd like to see the doc - it's easy to believe we've gotten something wrong > here.. Might be good to fix this as textual edits rather than waiting on a > full dwarf standard release because we're going to run into this a lot if > we can't get it sorted quickly as multiple producers all produce something > slightly different and incompatible. > > Thoughts?
Yes. Please do publish the document somewhere. It would be interesting to know exactly what is being said to be inconsistent. As far as I know the issue of the file index defaulting to one and not having a way to refer to index zero from an DIE attribute is inconvenient/inefficient (because you often end up duplicating the zero file entry), but not inconsistent. It is consistent with how DWARF4 line table file numbers are interpreted and I believe that is also how consumers do it. Thanks, Mark _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
