Added as Issue 240618.1 <https://dwarfstd.org/issues/240618.1.html>.
-cary On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 2:43 PM David Anderson via Dwarf-discuss < dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote: > BACKGROUND: > References are to DWARF5 unless otherwise indicated. > > The basic issue is that .debug_rnglists is sometimes > mentioned as being part of a split-full compilation > unit and yet other places say that is incorrect. > In other words the standard conflicts with itself. > > There is clarity in Sec 3.1.2 Skeleton Compil... > Page 66,67: > (lists a few attributes, not including > DW_AT_rnglists_base) > "All other attributes of a compilation unit > entry are placed in the split full compilation unit." > (comment: this makes Table F.1 incorrect) > > Sec 3.1.3 says DW_AT_rnglists_base is inherited > from the skeleton. That is wrong and corrected > in DW6. > > Table F.1 > DW5 has no check mark for DW_AT_rnglists_base > in Skelton or Split Full > Wrong. > > Table F.1 > DW6 has check mark for DW_AT_rnglists_base > in Skeleton but not Split Full. > Wrong. > > > PROPOSAL: > > Table F.1, for DW_AT_rnglists_base > should have: > No check-mark for Skeleton. > One check-mark for Split Full. > (the check-mark for Full & Partial > is correct in DW5 and DW6) > > > > David Anderson > -- > Dwarf-discuss mailing list > Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org > https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss >
-- Dwarf-discuss mailing list Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss
