Re: [dwm] improve config.mk

[Jack J. Woehr]

Apparently we are in violent agreement! :-) Well, I guess DWM must attract two types of "customers": 1) People who love simplicity. 2) People who want to take a simple piece of software someone else wrote and build castles in the sky from it! Or maybe we are each and everyone one of us a mixture of both!? On Sep 6, 2006, at 2:08 PM, Ricardo Martins wrote: On 13:52 Wed 06 Sep     , Jack J. Woehr wrote: On Sep 6, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Ricardo Martins wrote: An ebuild for dwm would be either too complex, due to the number of compile-time configuration options, or too simplistic, perhaps defaulting to config.default.h. As soon as I discovered DWM (last week!) I though immediately about an OpenBSD port tree port. But it's too easy to build dwm as is. Why complicate it? Exactly my point; that is, what I intended to say. --   Ricardo Martins  ><><  www.swearing-ape.net  ><><  GPG key: 3B818E27 --- Jack J. Woehr Director of Development Absolute Performance, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 303-443-7000 ext. 527