On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:32:18PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:21:44AM -0400, Doug Bell wrote: > > Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:31:16AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > > > I believe the code might get simplier as well. If someone needs > > > > to maximize a tiled client, there are two ways: > > > > > > > > A) toggle to floating mode and togglemax > > > > Then, to go back to the way it was means hitting togglemax and then > > toggling back to tiled, right? Four operations instead of two... > > > > > > OR > > > > > > > > B) toggle/tag a specific 'max' tag and view that tag instead > > > > So you change the client's tag, view that tag, then, to go back, you > > change the client's tag again and view the original tag. Again, four > > operations... > > > > > > Any remarks? > > > > > > One remark on my own. I believe one could re-use the > > > zoom-shortcut in floating mode for this maximization toggling. > > > It has similiar semantic. > > > > Re-using the shortcut would be slick, but I still prefer to keep > > togglemax on tiled clients. > > For those scenarios you pointed out, I'd prefer a 'takewith' > function which tags a specific client and views that tag in one > step. >
I also would like to keep the ability to maximize tiled clients. I think your proposed 'takewith' function could work (keeping the number of operations down is important) but this assumes that I always have an 'empty' tag available, right? This could be made part of config.default.h so that users are aware of this. cheers, Anthony
