> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:16:15PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: >> > Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2006-12-01, 17:06): >> > >> > > > I think the line is a better idea than the dots though.. two dots >> was >> > > > extremely confusing. I think if I were implementing this sort of >> change, >> > > > I'd manipulate the font weight before adding dots and lines. Maybe >> > > > something like bold = current client, italics = empty tag. >> > > >> > > I think that might be the way to go... >> > >> > This will look terribly ugly on bitmap fonts with fake-italics (and >> > often fake-bold too. >> > >> > How about trying a different background color instead of the second dot >> > than (or any other graphic symbols)? Just one more color configurable >> > from config.h. What do you think? >> >> Nah, we already have enough colors. Let's check Sanders >> proposal. > > hg tip contains sander1.png: > > http://www.suckless.org/shots/sander1.png > http://www.suckless.org/shots/sander2.png >
sander2 looks good! Anthony
