On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:50:09PM +0100, Martin Sander wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:36:36PM +0100, rumpel wrote: > > Nice, but wouldn't it look better with a mouse-over effect? > > "cool apps" > http://wmii.suckless.org/view.sh/cool+apps > > Web Browsers > > * Dillo > * ELinks > * Lynx > * w3m > * links2 > * Conkeror > > I think several of these don't support javascript (at least the console > browsers). Anyway, why equip a website for a keyboard-controlled wm with > mouse-effects? > Just my 2 cents worth.. > > Anselm, I really like the new design, its looks simple and practial.
Afaik hover effects are CSS and have nothing todo with JavaScript. And I plan to add those hover effects once the site is running. Such console-based browsers should simply ignore css, and afaik they do. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
