On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:08:49AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > On 9/20/07, Sylvain Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2007/9/20, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > > > With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project > > > > > called "awesome"[1], a direct neighbour of dwm. > > > > > > > > > > awesome is, yet, another window manager, which is based on dwm > > > > > source code. > > > > > In contrast to dwm, it does not have any limit about its SLOC size. > > > > > Consequently, it already includes some patches or ideas that people > > > > > dropped around in master. > > > > > > > > > > Any feedback will be appreciated, but in order to respect this list > > > > > which is about dwm, please answer to me or to the awesome list[2][3]. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the project, I will have a look tomorrow. > > > > > > > > What I miss right now from dwm are: > > > > 1) config file > > > > 2) the old NMASTER feature for vertical tiling > > > > > > Maybe I should try out one of the dwm patches to resurrect NMASTER > > > but I always back down at the thought of having to use an external patch > > > for a long time. > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > Maybe industrializing the use of patches in the Makefile would not be > > such a bad idea for such patchable window manager. > > I'm using dwm-4.3 for the time being.
What is so difficult in porting dwm-4.3 tile() to dwm-4.5? Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
