On Dec 8, 2007 7:54 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:52:23PM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > > On Dec 8, 2007 2:38 PM, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I like the idea, but librote lacks terminal resizing. There's no > > > proper library for terminal emulation now. I think we should start a > > > project to implement vt100 in a library in a suckless way. What do you > > > think about this idea? > > > > Good idea. Could be definitely worthwile. Something like libvt with > > dtach/screen capabilities? > > > > Anselm, would st include any such code which could/should > > be shared? Just curious as I don't know much about unix > > terminal emulation other than that it is pretty outdated > > compared to what Plan9 has :) > > libvt might be an idea. st definately might use it. However, st
I was not suggesting to depend on libvt as it could impose too much of an external dependency. I meant we could/should write a vt lib or share vt code. > is planned to replace screen/dtach, a terminal should be a > viewer only to something like an st-client (screen/dtach) > instance. So st will include dtach/screen capabilities like detaching and/or multi-terminal management and also be able to run screen/dtach inside one of these views?