"Daniel Bainton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/5/12 Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I agree, but still the SLOC is a related indicator if the > > functionality has been implemented in a decent way at its level. > > If a file editor (vim) consists of >200.000 SLOC, something is > > wrong obviously. > > So, any volunteers to implement a suckless vim clone? :P
Well, there's the traditional vi [1], VIrus [2] or BusyBox vi [3]. But none of them really sucks less. But wait for st before you rush to implement a suckless clone. By the way I prefer reinventing and improving instead of cloning. > -- > Daniel Gruß Matthias-Christian [1] http://ex-vi.sourceforge.net/ [2] http://www.rocklinux.net/people/ripclaw/projects/software/virus/ [3] http://busybox.net/
