On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 04:02:51PM +0200, Sylvain Bertrand wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Sylvain, > > > > any chance to let us agree on the MIT license for the IPv6 bits? > > Ok, make it all MIT ( 10 lines... :) ), but you should really consider > GPLv3 instead of MIT, just because we don't live in a perfect world... > really...
Thank you! My licensing reasons are rather pragmatic, the reasons why I don't use the GPL* are: 1) I don't understand it completely and in any detail. So I stick to MIT that I know and understand any impact of it. 2) To be honest, I think that license violations in commercial products who might use GPLed code are hard to proof if they are done properly, so I believe that the GPL doesn't protect you that much in the real world from license violation. It's a different story in theory of course. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361