On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:47:33PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:35:20AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > > That's mainly proprietary software. dwm shouldn't support that kind of > software, but instead expose their bare brokenness to the user. Maybe users > will realise then that proprietary software is not worth using, because you > can't even fix trivial bugs like this.
Except some of us don't have a choice and have to use this for their work or at uni... > Regards, > Matthias-Christian Regards, Valentin
