On (20/05/09 11:34), yy wrote: > To: dwm mail list <dwm@suckless.org> > From: yy <yiyu....@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list > Reply-To: dwm mail list <dwm@suckless.org> > List-Id: dwm mail list <dwm.suckless.org> > > 2009/5/20 Szabolcs Nagy <nszabo...@gmail.com>: > > On 5/20/09, Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@, > >> and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who > >> are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically could just stay on > >> dwm@ resp. w...@. That should be technically possible. > > > > dwm, wmii -> hackers > > hackers -> dwm, wmii > > > > so one sends a mail to dwm@ then it goes to hackers@ then someone > > replies there and the reply goes to w...@? > > > > Maybe I'm being naive, mailing lists are not my strong point. But IMO > you can send the messages to the people subscribed to hackers with the > corresponding FROM: field (dwm or wmii). So, if one sends a mail to > dwm, you recive it as coming from dwm. Since hackers subscribed recive > mail from both lists, the reply will arrive to dwm and hackers > subscribers. Only if you specifically send an email to hackers it will > be received by both lists (and you could, for example, change the TO: > field when the discussion goes off-topic). Maybe somebody knows if I'm > right or absolutely wrong. > > -- > - yiyus || JGL . >
Well, or you can just simply post to both dwm@ and wmii@ :) (for example, both in to: of email). Whole this discussion is all but not suckless :) -- Premysl "Anydot" Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/ - I'm a signature virus. Please add me to your signature and help me spread!
