I proposed almost the exact same thing (even to the 10 year period of no activity) several years ago but I wasn't taken seriously.
I still think it's a good idea. 73, Zack W9SZ On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote: > Good point. > > Another reason why it behooves us to be on our best behavior in dealing with > the Powers That Be. > > One tangential thought: If there are several entities that for political or > administrative reasons are off-limits for amateur operating, and have been > for a significant (minimum 10 years) period of time, would you consider not > counting them in the Honor Roll totals? Think this through carefully... we > have VU4, VU7, P5, KP1, and KP5 in that category right now. We get a few > more, and it becomes close to impossible for amateurs licensed in the last > 10 years or so to ever achieve HR unless this situation should change. > > ...and I sure hope that it does, but bureaucrats have long memories, and > it's easier to say "no" than to grant permission... > > 73, ron wn3vaw > Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
