That's not what I said.
There's no reason to rework SUDAN again. But the new nation of Southern Sudan (or whatever name the country ultimately ends up with) is not, for DXCC purposes, the same entity as the now-deleted entity of the autonomous region of Southern Sudan. The fact that there are current SUDAN stations using the prefix of ST0, which at one time was generally in use in & recognized as the prefix of the now defunct Southern Sudan, is irrelevant. As they say at PNC Park "Programs! Programs! You can't tell the players without a program!" In other words, don't be misled by a prefix. After all. would you consider a VR6 you worked today as a Pitcairn station because only a few short years ago, it was the prefix for Pitcairn - but is today the prefix assigned to Hong Kong? Of course not, I hope! 73 _____ From: Don Berger [mailto:dberger...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 7:49 PM To: wn3...@verizon.net; DX-CHAT@njdxa.org Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] South Sudan I'm confused - if there is no reason, as Ron explains, to work ST0 again, why is NCDXF financially supporting a dx-pedition? K1VSK ----------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org -----------------------------------------------------------
