On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 05:38 +0000, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > It does seem too high, Ted. Can we make a 9.10 goal a review of that?
Sure, I'm running it under callgrind now. I'm guessing that we're getting killed by getting woken up when people come off and on DBus, which we're doing to protect against applications crashing... but, data is better that suspicion :) -- indicator-applet guzzles CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365187 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Indicator Applet Developers, which is the registrant for Indicator Applet. Status in Indicator Applet: Incomplete Bug description: On a system up for roughly 6 days, indicator-applet had used over 200 minutes of CPU time. This is a portable system, so it's also wasting battery runtime. Considering the rather limited scope of what indicator-applet does, it should be consuming 2-3 orders of magnitude less CPU time. 4911 brianr 20 0 31740 13m 5804 R 91 0.7 208:45.69 indicator-apple (To put things in perspective, the X server on this same machine has racked up only 332 minutes of CPU time). _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dx-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dx-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
