Actually I would recommend you jump to XP (either home or pro). I also work in the industry and Win2K is over 4 years in terms of design, etc. (a life time in this industry).
XP has been much more stable than Win2K and certainly much more efficient. I have installed it on very important users without one complaint (my mother-in-law, etc.) :) My 2 cents worth.. Mike VA3MW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Teemu S Korhonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <dx4win@mailman.qth.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 8:49 AM Subject: SV: [Dx4win] Windows 2000 Professional Alan, and everybody else. I can recommend you to upgrade your system to WIN2K, I am running it here and it works great together with DX4WIN, BUT! You can not use the Parallel port (LPT) for CW with your transceiver. I have a MarkV here which I computer control via COM1, I have built a simple interface for doing CW on the same cable as computer control. Otherwise DX4WIN is running smoothly on all my "computers". (They all have WIN2K) 73, cu in the pileups. Teemu, SM0WKA - SM0W -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För n5pa Skickat: den 3 februari 2003 23:44 Till: dx4win@mailman.qth.net Ämne: [Dx4win] Windows 2000 Professional I am currently running Windows 98 SE on my P4 system and as expected have all kinds of problems. I have Windows 2000 Professional and would like to upgrade to that rather than XP Pro. Are there any known glitches with Win2k? I use a W1WEF Model 3 CW Interface on my LPT port. I also use a Byte-Runner 4-port Serial card. I am extremely computer literate (30 years in the business), but want to know any experience with DX4WIN. 73's Alan, N5PA _______________________________________________ Dx4win mailing list Dx4win@mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win _______________________________________________ Dx4win mailing list Dx4win@mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
