I like MMTTY and continue to use it for just the neat RTTY tuning indicator. I have carefully compared my KAM, MMTTY and MixW for receiving RTTY, and MixW definitely has the edge, with MMTTY second.
MixW is appealing also since it runs CW, Packet, FSK31, AMTOR, PACTOR (receive only), MFSK, Throb, MT63, Hellschreiber, FAX and SSTV, as well as BPSK31 and QPSK31. I do not use its logging capabilities. 73, John, K2CIB ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roy Dancy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bob Check" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <dx4win@mailman.qth.net> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 7:07 PM Subject: Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN New Version > I must agree about MMTTY. I operate 99% RTTY and much like MMTTY. > > 73 y'all N4AN > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bob Check" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <dx4win@mailman.qth.net> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:44 AM > Subject: Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN New Version > > > > Yes, I will be changing programs soon if we can't get RTTY and the other > > fix's & changes mentioned, 2 years between updates is way to long! > > > > 73, Bob w8gc > > > > Heartily concur.....so many others have done it - and quite some time ago. > > > > 73, > > Joe > > WD0M > > > > At 09:22 AM 4/13/2004, Steve GW4BLE wrote: > > > > > Although not a particular RTTY aficionado, it still seems (to me) a > > > pity an > > > MMTTY interface is *not* planned for the new release, but we have to > wait > > > until the "one after"..... > > > > > > 73 > > > > > > Steve > > > GW4BLE > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dx4win mailing list > > Dx4win@mailman.qth.net > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dx4win mailing list > > Dx4win@mailman.qth.net > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win > > > _______________________________________________ > Dx4win mailing list > Dx4win@mailman.qth.net > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win >
