Hello to all,
I am a relatively new user to DX4WIN and just recently have tried uploading to
LoTW and seem to be having the same kinds of problems with Ignore. I chose
Ignore in the preferences file so that I would have complete control over the
QSLing process. Now when I try to create an ADIF file for upload to LoTW those
QSO's that have Ignore are excluded. Further when I manually set the Upload
flag on for those Q's with Ignore and then try to create the ADIF file no
QSO's, including those that had the Upload flag turned on previously and not
set manually, are created in the resulting ADIF file. The file size is only 40
bytes in this case and does not contain any QSO's as far as I can determine.
My personal preference is to continue with Ignore in the preferences file to
allow me full control over the QSLing process but I do not feel Ignore should
have an impact on creation of a LoTW file. It would be a rare instance, I
think, where a user did not want to upload all of the Q's to LoTW. If some are
to be excluded I would prefer to turn the Upload flag off manually.
BTW, I'm on 6.03. And although I haven't tried it there does seem to be a way
to perform a global change to selected QSO's to set the QSL Method field;
QSO>Multiple QSO operations>Set QSL method.
Are Buddy and I the only ones that are not entirely happy with the impact of
Ignore on LoTW?
Jerry N8BM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:25:35 -0800
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Dx4win] QSL Flag
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
I am trying to export the more recent part of my log to LOTW.
I read that having the QSL flag set to "Ignore" can cause problems.
How can I change the flag to something else without doing them all manually?
Any suggestions on what the flag should default to, in the future?
73, Buddy/K4CJB
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 4 10:28:23 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Date: Tue Jan 4 10:31:18 2005
Subject: [Dx4win] QSL Flag
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- JerryVan N8BM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are Buddy and I the only ones that are not entirely happy with the impact of
> Ignore on LoTW?
Jerry, take heart! The Ignore problem will be fixed in 6.04. Paul claims it
is already fixed, but I (we) have not received the beta test version with the
fix (yet).
73 - Jim AD1C
=====
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.ad1c.com
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 4 12:08:02 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Date: Tue Jan 4 12:10:56 2005
Subject: [Dx4win] Last call for changes to the DX4WIN.CTY country file
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm working on updates to the DX4WIN.CTY country file. Revision notes for the
next release (10) can be found here:
http://www.ad1c.com/dx4win/history.htm
I will be releasing the file the weekend of January 8/9 if not earlier.
If you want me to make any changes, please let me know ASAP.
Thanks & 73 - Jim AD1C
=====
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.ad1c.com
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 4 16:29:44 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (wo2n)
Date: Tue Jan 4 16:32:33 2005
Subject: [Dx4win] Cluster spots coming in?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Anyone have an answer for doing a:
SH/DX/10 VU4 last 10 spots show in rtty window, okay, but ONLY 4 of the
spots show up in the SPOT window??? In other words both windows don't report
the same amount of spots?
thx es 73 de Bernie./WO2N.>
version 5
