Ok Jim I hadn't read you application note. Yes I usually do just accept the date offered which is the date of the last download I'm not entirely convinced that explains all the . Entries I get, for example the last download generated 205 . Reports and 13 X reports, the previous ones report similar numbers. Assuming I did the download at 23:59utc and captured a days worth of cross over's, I wouldn't mind 205 LoTW cfms a day X 365 = 74825 LoTW cfms a year, I only have 109,000 + QSO's in the LoTW system.
More to the point than how these QSO's become eligible for report the fact remains regardless to if they are re submits from the other party or worse a system shortfall in timing of reports, there is no logical action to take so why does DX4WIN report them? 73 John ZL1BYZ. -----Original Message----- From: jjreis...@gmail.com [mailto:jjreis...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jim Reisert AD1C Sent: Wednesday, 2 March 2011 13:04 To: John Shaw Cc: dx4win@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Lotwreport.notfound file On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:20 PM, John Shaw <jns...@internet.co.nz> wrote: > You are correct with the . In the left column. Not much we can do > about that, if people keep uploading their whole logs over and over > they will keep showing up on this list. For those LoTW users who do > this, you may not think it a problem but it can be. This problem isn't caused by "people ... uploading their whole logs over and over". If I upload an identical QSO that is already in LoTW, it won't be considered a new match. I tried to explain what really causes this problem in my application note on LoTW. I'll explain it again here. ______________________________________________________________ Dx4win mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
