I added information about the new version numbers to the note, but apparently it was over-written (by my software) just before I sent it.
The "whole number" part of the version number is the last two digits of the calendar year. The "decimal" part is the # of the release within that year. It just so happens that this would have been release #154 under the old numbering scheme. After 16.9 comes 16.10. That doesn't work math-wise, sorry. -- Jim Reisert AD1C, <jjreis...@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us ______________________________________________________________ DX4WIN mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
