If I understood everything correctly, a sort by call within prefix makes that problem go away doesn't it?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 22:05 Subject: Re: [DXBase] sort by prefix and label printing > Ron, > > That's just the beginning of complexity.... consider multiple Qs for same > call on same label. If not sorted by callsign, that process would break > since the way to know when to move on to the next label is when the callsign > that is next in line to be printed is different than the last one printed. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ron Stordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:26 AM > Subject: Re: [DXBase] sort by prefix and label printing > > > > I just finished sorting 1000 cards, about 2/3 going via the bureau, the > rest > > via WF5E or direct so I can appreciate that you say. > > > > However it is complicated by 'via manager calls'. In such cases the card > > must be sorted via the managers prefix not the qso prefix. > > > > I also would like to see a solution to this. > > > > Ron N5IN > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jamie Tolbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:04 AM > > Subject: [DXBase] sort by prefix and label printing > > > > > > > First experience printing labels in dxbase; kinda neat but frustrating > at > > > the same time. I exported the qsos to be printed into a separate log, > > > sorted by prefix to send to the buro and used the wizard to mark all for > > > printing then ran output to labels. When I preview the labels they are > > > sorted by callsign rather than by prefix. The log however is sorted by > > > prefix correctly ( 7S contacs with the SM, 4B with XE, etc.) When > > > previewed though the 7S are in with the 7L, etc. Am I making sense? I > > > guess it isn't a big deal but it sure would be nice to print them as > > > sorted so the stack can go right to the buro without resorting? Is this > > > possible? BTW is been almost 24 hours and I'm still not sure if my other > > > posts ever made it....this mail sure is slow. Maybe a new phrase, > e-snail? > > > > > > 73 Jamie WW3S > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web > > > www.dxbase.com > > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web > > www.dxbase.com > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > > > > _______________________________________________ > DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web > www.dxbase.com > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase >
