Tom, Have not been following this thread since I figured it would have an easy answer, but guess not. In 2003, the prefixes for JT and VP6D were already present in the prefix databases that were shipped. So, I don't really understand what you added and why. The default prefix databases that were shipped should handle it all except that you might have needed to add an alias map for VP6D mapped to VP6D. Not sure if that map was present. Otherwise, there is nothing else involved. There should only be one prefix for JT and one for VP6D in the primary prefix database. If you have more than this, that would be a problem.
Regards, Courtney ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Whitten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 3:31 PM Subject: [DXBase] JT1 and VP6D problem? > 1st tnx to all of you who are trying to help! i have checked these qso and > also database to make sure that the JT1 and the V96DI are mapped correctly, > and they are. So still not sure why Dxbase still indicates in the dxinfo > and internet cluster window, that i need them? AA1BQ > > _______________________________________________ > DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web at www.dxbase.com > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > To UNSUBSCRIBE please visit: > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase >
